Skip to content

Trump and alternative facts

Throughout a private meeting with congressional leaders on Monday, President Trump asserted that his opponent had been voted for by between three million and five million immigrants and robbed him of a victory in the nationwide popular election. There isn’t any evidence to support the position, which continues to be repeatedly discredited by numerous fact checkers.

From standing by the president phrases on Tuesday during a briefing with reporters in the White House, that didn’t stop the White House press secretary, Spicer. “As I said, I think the leader has believed that for a time predicated on studies and tips he’s,” Mr. Spicer stated. That appears to be true. Mr. Trump again and again raised doubts regarding the ethics of the American voting system before the election in November, and it has wrongly said since his triumph that millions of folks voted illegally.

Bigotry

Pushed presenting evidence on Thursday, Mr. Spicer seemed to conflate two distinct studies that Mr. Trump’s employees had formerly mentioned in protecting his state. “There’s one who arrived from Pew in 2008 that showed 14% of those who voted were non-citizens,” Mr. Spicer reported. “ There studies which were introduced to him.”

The facts are as follows


Neither research Mr. Spicer apparently known to helps Mr. Trump’s state. The initial research mentioned on Horse Crate and was conducted in 2014 by a professor at Old Dominion University, a website managed by The Washington Post. Utilizing the information in the Combined Congressional Election Study, the investigators discovered that 14 percent of non-citizens who replied to the study in 2008 and 2010 stated these were enrolled to vote.

The thing is the research relied on information that is flawed and was scrutinized by political experts who said that a more attentive evaluation of the information uncovered no signs that non-citizens had voted in recent elections. The next study, conducted in the year 2012 from the Pew Center on the States, found that 2-4 thousand voter users were no longer legitimate or “significantly wrong”; that over 1.8 million dead folks were still recorded on the voter rolls; which nearly three thousand were authorized in several states, likely because they’d transferred from condition to another.

The research failed to find signs that these problems brought to voter fraud, nevertheless, only that they offered issues and preventable costs in the procedure. The principal writer David Becker, of the research, made that simple in Nov in a Facebook post. On Facebook, he published on Thursday that voting ethics in the November election had enhanced. The lack of studies supporting the state isn’t all that’s operating against Mr. Trump. Law and selection enforcement officials everywhere, who tracked reports of voter fraud condition by state, have reported they found no credible evidence of scams that was widespread.

The response in Congress


Mr. Trump’s statement similarly discovered small support from his Republican colleagues on Capitol Hill. “I’ve observed no signs to that impact,” Home Presenter John D. Ryan told newspersons on Monday when questioned about the proposed voter fraud. In an interview with Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, encouraged Mr. Trump to “knock this away.” “This will deteriorate his power to rule this state if he doesn’t prevent it,” Mr. Graham said, adding the leader required to provide evidence because of his beliefs if he would carry on to claim them. The others merely deflected queries about Mr. Trump’s statements.

Asked about the accuracy of the president’s appraisal, the majority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, decided to answer a question no one had asked. “It does occur,” he said of voter fraud, declining to quantify the range. “There are regular discussions on both sides about how much, how common and all the rest.”

Related Articles

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *